JUSTICE LEAGUE #1

Review by: Joshrector

What did the
iFanboy
community think?

1763
Pulls
Avg Rating: 4.1
 
Users who pulled this comic:
Written by GEOFF JOHNS
Art and cover by JIM LEE and SCOTT WILLIAMS
Variant cover by DAVID FINCH

Size: 40 pages
Price: 3.99

If this first issue of the Lee/Johns Justice League is meant to be the mission statement for the new DCU, I think it’s clear what direction DC wants to take it’s super hero line… Image Comics circa 1993.

Jim Lee is always going to evoke the style of the nineties in his art… but I was surprised at how chaotic and awkward his storytelling was in this issue. The transitions from panel to panel felt awkward, a lot of panels felt cluttered and claustrophobic and a lot of Jim Lee’s choices emphasized flash over substance.

In terms of the writing, Geoff Johns was given a very difficult task. He has to engage and hook a completely new audience, while at the same time servicing a presumptively skeptical existing audience. And I think that Johns has gotten himself stuck between those two goals. When the dialog isn’t carry the heavy weight of exposition, it’s annoucing character traits at a full pitch volume.
BATMAN:”I’M METHODICAL!”
GREEN LANTERN:”I’M ARROGANT!
BATMAN: “I LIKE SHADOWS!”
GREEN LANTERN: “I LIKE LIGHT!”

We’re told everything, never shown it.

And as for the plot, there wasn’t really that much of it. Batman chases a nondescript monster, Green Lantern joins him, the monster kills himself “for Darkseid,” Vic Stone has daddy issues and Superman shows up at the end. For all the flash bang of the action scenes… the entire thing felt fluffy and insubstantial.

In other words it was written just like an issue of WildC.A.T.S. or Cyber Force back in the day.

Story: 2 - Average
Art: 3 - Good

Comments

  1. yerp!

  2. this contains spoilers. thanks a lot, fucker!

  3. This is what I was afraid of. I could see a comic like this bringing in a lot of new readers . . . if the calendar said 1992.

    And no offense to other reviewers, but if this comic only gets 4s (or a 3.9 overall) on iFanboy, where things tend to get the most positive spin possible, you know the product isn’t as great as it pretty much HAD to be in order to achieve the success they wanted.

  4. I disagree there was only telling and no showing. I think that was a knee-jerk criticism. The rest of the review seems genuine though. In fact we are shown the tension between the characters quite effectively. For instance, Batman handles the police by shooting a cloud of smoke at them, thereby hiding himself. Green Lantern does everything opposite. He builds a huge conspicuous fire truck to smash an alien and flies a construct jet plane low to the ground over a populated area. The dialog between GL and Bats you may have construed as being “telling, not showing” was entirely believable. I think there is more subtlety to this issue than you give it credit for.

Leave a Comment