CleophusWayne
Name: michael neal
Bio: Comics: not just reading material.
Twitter:
Reviews
The reasons for the Eisner status of this book are beginning to dawn on me. I hope the iFanboys give…
Read full review and commentsI’ve been a fan of Robinson’s Superman but I found this issue annoying at best. It’s basically five short stories,…
Read full review and commentsFrontline should be dead as a concept, mini-series, whatever you want to call it. The last two, that revolved around…
Read full review and commentsAll reviews by CleophusWayne
Also, I loved Kat Dennings and I thought her and Skarsgard and Portman made a really fun team.
Also also, the Asgard design and explanation of magic-science and the tree of life worked masterfully. I loved the view of a waterfall flowing into space near the end as Heimdall and Thor stood at the edge of the bridge.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-02/wonder-woman-a-sneak-peak-at-david-e-kelleys-script/
"what would a police duck say to a suicidal bear?"
I've seen worse stereotypical portrayals of people who read comic books. Everything else about the scene looked normal to me. The shop pretty much looks like the shop (I live a block away), and a guy wearing a Captain America shirt is hardly flamboyant.
Kate Miccuci in elfan ears was a bit much, but that offended me more on a comedic level than on one based on media stereotypes. And that shop is almost bulletproof from base portrayals just due to the fact it looks so great.
He makes perfect sense. I'm just not a fan. Very stylized filmmaker but his storytelling leaves me feeling empty. I am curious to see how he constructs a comic book story without using direct source material. I've only seen his movies 300 and Watchmen and they were both so faithful to the source material it became uninteresting.
Brubaker talks about this in his last Word Balloon, which is excellent by the way.