![Avatar photo](https://ifanboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/eaglebauer1.jpg)
EAGLEBAUER
Name: Paul Jaissle
Bio: I like Batman.
Twitter:
Reviews
It’s almost impossible, and a little foolish, to judge “Wednesday Comics” in the same way as any other comic. I…
Read full review and commentsI’m sure that others will have much more to say with regards to Final Crisis, but I thought I’d offer…
Read full review and commentsAll reviews by EAGLEBAUER
Looks like I agree with Ron: after having a few days to think about it, I liked the movie more than I did initially. Still, though, I didn't love it. In fact, my ambivalence toward the whole thing is a big problem: it didn't really move me one way or the other. I thought the first 30-45 minutes were great, especially the title sequence. After that, though, the movie felt like a series of "greatest hits" from the book. Sure, it looked great and was really faithful to the book, but all the context that gives those moments emotional weight was missing. The sense of impending nuclear war that permeates the book is just replaced by characters saying, "hey, world war III could happen any moment," and the ending was so dumbed down it barely packed any punch at all. My biggest complaint, though, was the fight sequences (in the ally and prison) and the sex scene. At those moments, the movie felt like just another big, dumb, stereotypical "comic book" movie. The book is cited as a mature work not because it was graphic, but because it was morally ambiguous. Here in the movie, we have people in costumes snapping off people's arms and throwing each other across the room (Snyder did realize that Nite Owl and Silk Specter don't have super powers, right???), which is exactly the sort of juvenile non-sense that Moore was critiquing in the book. That said, like Conor, I would be curious to see it again, not in nit-picking mode.