HAUNT #1

Review by: comicBOOKchris

What did the
iFanboy
community think?

495
Pulls
Avg Rating: 3.7
 
Users who pulled this comic:


Size: pages
Price: 2.99

While reading one of the pages of this issue, I felt that I had stepped into a time machine and was transported back to the 90’s. You know that scene where Kurt Kilgore is in a nearly full page spread, clad in a kevlar bodysuit with many pouches, runs towards the reader with big guns a-blazing and a war face with a gaping mouth? God, it was like I was reading an old issue of Cable. 

That aside, I kind of enjoyed this debut issue of of Haunt despite its flaws. These flaws, I think, fall squarly on the shoulders of Todd McFarlane’s premise and plotting for this overall series. It involves an amoral soldier of fortune named Kurt Kilgore, who was unjustly killed by his superiors, and can now posses his preist brother Daniel (who is also amoral) and turn into a SYMBIOTE SPAWN who is invincible and brutal. It’s a very silly 90’s Image premise that nowadays we make fun of, and since this is the introductary issue, this silly premise outshines any good the script or art does.

Everything else is fine, though. Even though the premise of this book is stuck in the Hootie & The Blowfish era, Robert Kirkman’s script doesn’t have that stilted sound and is compentantly written. I’m sure that his normally strong writting will help add some depth to the initial plot. Ryan Ottley’s art is also very good. It’s very bloody and dark, though we’ve seen Ottley shine with the ultra-violent scenes in Invinclible, and they’re equally as impressive here.

I know I’ve been ragging on the initial plot of Haunt, but even though it’s a bit harebrained, it makes for a very light and enjoyable read. I’m going to wait until the first arc is done to judge this series as a whole, but by the looks of this debut issue, it’s looking to be some brainless and bloody fun.

Story: 3 - Good
Art: 3 - Good

Comments

  1. This book does look like a 90’s comic. But I’m probably gonna wait on trade for this. Good review though.

  2. I’m someone who has never had anything against McFarlane and also someone who feels no need to hide the giant Spawn paperbacks on his bookshelf when others come over. With that said, I was shocked when I read that this had sold out. It just reeks of unoriginality to me. Someone is unjustly murdered by his superiors and he comes back with supernatural powers? Is this a trick to get people to like Spawn again? Have Kirkman start writing it and call it a different name?

  3. I forgot to mention how much Daniel the priest rubbed me the wrong was as a character. He exudes that faux-90’s grit and edge that seems so phony.

Leave a Comment