Avatar photo

mattstee

Name: Matt Steele

Bio:


Reviews
mattstee's Recent Comments
March 27, 2009 1:42 am

@Jimski:  I am taking the stand that Sayid shooting Ben is not a deviation from what has happened. It looked like Ben in this episode knew the outcome and that is why he (in his own weird way) positioned Sayid to the event he already knew happened.

 

My only hang-up is the weird Christian - Sun - Lepidas scene from last week 

March 27, 2009 12:20 am Callback to the Boone/Shannon episode season one
March 27, 2009 12:19 am

It is part of a series that came out during the 90s

 

Author: Carlos Castaneda

Date: 1972

Genre(s):  Essays; Nonfiction novels

 

Journey to Ixtlan is the third in the series of books written by Carlos Castaneda about his experiences and apprenticeship with don Juan Matus, a Yaqui Indian sorcerer. The first two books, The Teachings of Don Juan and A Separate Reality, introduce Castaneda as an anthropologist interested in the use of peyote--a hallucinogenic derived from cactus--among Indians of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. He becomes acquainted with don Juan, an expert in the use of three hallucinogens: jimson weed, peyote, and a mushroom from the genus Psilocybe. He eventually becomes an initiate of the sorcerer. The first two books describe the apprenticeship by recounting a series of experiences in "nonordinary reality" produced by the ingestion of psychotropic plants. Journey to Ixtlan, on the other hand, focuses on the worldview of the sorcerer, who posits that the world at hand is merely a description that humans are gradually indoctrinated into as children. In order to transcend that view, according to don Juan, one must "stop the world" and then learn how to see, which is contrasted with ordinary perceptions that are likened simply to "looking."

Journey to Ixtlan is divided in two parts. Part I, "Stopping the World," comprises the journal-like entries Castaneda compiled from December 1960 to December 1962 in which don Juan spells out his approach. Don Juan stresses the need for full awareness and connection with one's surroundings, as in the chapter titled "Reaffirmations from the World Around Us"; reestablishing personal identity by freeing oneself from ego and from the socialization process of community; breaking from routines; assuming responsibility for all of one's actions; and becoming what don Juan calls a warrior--an alert, disciplined, and independent man of power. The warrior is likened to a hunter, always alert to his surroundings and ever-searching for a position of advantage, or avoiding points of disadvantage, against potential adversaries. The attributes of a warrior are reflected in state of mind--alert, serious, respectful--and body, from the way one moves ("the gait of power") to the way one cares for oneself. The experiences Castaneda has under don Juan's tutelage are both mental and physical: the former involves the practice of noticing and interpreting everything in one's surroundings, from the direction of the wind, to the nature of vegetation, to finding omens, and the physical includes actual hunting expeditions for food. Part One concludes with Castaneda forced to employ everything he has learned in a confrontation against a sorceress called La Catalina.

Part II consists of three chapters in which Castaneda returns in 1971 to visit don Juan. They are joined by don Juan's friend don Genaro, who had made several appearances in Part I and performed incredible feats--from swimming on a floor to summoning thunderous noises from nearby mountains. The sorcerers recap elements of Castaneda's apprenticeship and reiterate with dazzling and sometimes frightening examples what it takes to be a warrior. Castaneda admits to still feeling overwhelmed by immense and dangerous powers into which he has been initiated as well as feeling sad about having to relinquish his personal history--friends, places, artifacts, and other forms of comfort. Don Genaro describes his own life as a sorcerer as a journey to Ixtlan, the place from which he came and now can never go back. The sorcerers inform Castaneda about his final step--an appointment with his "ally" in a dark valley ahead. The ally will further empower and protect Castaneda now that his apprenticeship is fulfilled. As don Juan and don Genaro turn away to leave him to his appointment, don Juan insists that Castaneda should only go if he is ready: "Nothing is gained by forcing the issue. If you want to survive you must be crystal clear and deadly sure of yourself." Castaneda watches them walk away until they disappear in the distance, then goes to his car and drives away, knowing his time is not yet at hand.

Source:  "Journey to Ixtlan," in Literature Resource Center, Gale Research, 1999.

Source Database:  Literature Resource Center 

March 27, 2009 12:17 am

@ nickmaynard 

The book is

A separate reality : further conversations with Don Juan - Carlos Castaneda

Carlos continues his apprenticeship with Don Juan, and learns about such things as "stopping the world," "seeing," and "stalking". 

 

March 19, 2009 2:36 am

@Conor: The Leia animosity was one thing, but I also felt that they didn't see eye to eye alot. Luke seemed to not have the best opinion of Hans decision making until Jedi.

That being said, I don't hold the stance that they are best friends, I just feel that we are at a point in the story where they don't hate each other (Jack would have called him James).  I think Sawyer's reaction didn't come from "I am awesome and you suck" perspective but a reaction to stress and a long-standing trend of Sawyer venting on someone.

I feel another interesting note is that sawyer's criticism is Jack only reacts, but I have yet to see sawyer in DI not doing anything but reacting. 

March 19, 2009 2:21 am @Conor: That's true ... but how many of the survivors could you say would be friends outside?  I also hate to go back to Star Wars references but if Han and Luke weren't thrown together would they have been friends?
March 19, 2009 2:04 am @Coner. Tend to agree with most things you saw but I have to disagree with your assessment of that Jack and Sawyer dislike each other.  Sawyer himself say at one point that Jack is the "closest thing he has as a friend on the island."  While I don't think they are the best of friends, I do believe that they are similiar to the Han and Luke friendship in a New Hope and Empire.  What Sawyer tells Jack in this episode is an accurate analysis of Jack's leadership skills, it is someone close to him giving criticism.  The most interesting part of that Jack seems relieved by it.  You can almost see the burden lift from him.
February 5, 2009 2:28 am The New York Times
June 18, 1986, Wednesday, Late City Final Edition
ENGLISH THINKER (1748-1832) PRESERVES HIS POISE

BYLINE: By JOSEPH LELYVELD, Special to the New York Times

SECTION: Section A; Page 2, Column 3; Foreign Desk

LENGTH: 1255 words

DATELINE: LONDON, June 16



Jeremy Bentham, the father of the Utilitarian school of philosophy and various strains of modern British thought on society and law, addressed himself a year before his death in 1832 to what might have seemed to him to be the ultimate utilitarian question: ''Of what use is a dead man to the living?''

As he was accustomed to doing, he then answered his own question at considerable length in an essay that, like roughly one-third of the enormous corpus of his works, has never been published. A dead man could be of use to the living, the philosopher reasoned, if his corpse was made available to further the the study of anatomy; and also, in the case of men of exceptional intellect, if the remains were then embalmed and preserved in order to give the dead a physical presence that might inspire future generations of thinkers.

Bentham, who liked giving names to things, decided to call his pickled, stuffed or mounted geniuses ''auto-icons.'' A philosophical materialist who scorned organized religion, he then described how a preserved philosopher might be used in observances by a cult of rationalists.



Finally, in the last draft of his will, the daring idea that was raised only abstractly in his essay finally emerged full-blown: the philosopher proposed that he himself be turned into an ''auto-icon,'' to be found seated in a favorite chair in his own clothes ''in the attitude in which I am sitting when engaged in thought.'' #154 Years Later, a Meeting He then suggested the design of ''an appropriate box or case'' in which he might be kept. ''If it should so happen that my personal friends and other Disciples should be disposed to meet together on some day or days of the year,'' he wrote, ''for the purpose of commemorating the Founder of the greatest happiness system of morals and legislation my executor will from time to time cause to be conveyed to the room in which they meet the said Box or case with the contents there to be stationed in such part of the room as to the assembled company shall seem meet.''

Last week, 154 years after his death at the age of 84, the philosopher's living admirers and students - it was not clear that there were any disciples - were present in force at University College, London, for the founding of an International Bentham Society. And so, almost precisely as he envisioned, was Jeremy Bentham, in his box in the form of an ''auto-icon.''

It was a distinguished assembly. Even Bentham, a man of soaring vanity, would have been impressed. Two of Britain's most eminent contemporary philosophers, Sir Alfred Ayer and H. L. A. Hart, were there. So were Lords Goff and Butterworth and the vice chancellor of Oxford University, Sir Patrick Neill. University College itself - sometimes thought erroneously to have been founded by Bentham but certainly an example of his far-reaching influence - turned out an impressive array of professors and scholars as it has done on various occasions since 1850 when the Bentham auto-icon came into its keeping.

The new society is designed to promote Bentham. University College is home to a Bentham Club and a Bentham Committee, both situated in Bentham House. The club, the alumni association of the law faculty, sells Bentham neckties to its members that are decorated with silhouettes of the philosopher's straw hat; the committee, which draws sustenance from the Jeremy Bentham Appeal, publishes a Bentham Newsletter that reports on the progress of the Bentham Project -an effort, already 25 years old, to publish the philosopher's collected works. Twelve volumes have been published so far, but these include less than 20 percent of what there is to publish.
 
It Looks Like Jack Benny

The auto-icon, which bears a resemblance to the comedian Jack Benny, looked distantly pleased. In point of fact, the object contains less of the philosopher than he had hoped, for the embalming of his head was not a success and a wax reproduction by a French anatomist had to be substituted. For years the actual head was kept in a case inside Bentham's box. Sometimes, as a photograph taken in 1948 illustrates, it was taken out of the case and exhibited on a plate-like object between the great thinker's feet.

''Now it is kept in the cellar,'' said Sir James Lighthill, the Provost of University College, outside whose office Jeremy Bentham normally resides. ''He encourages me to engage in utilitarian educational projects, which I do,'' Sir James said.

Bentham still wears his original clothes, except for his undershirt, which had to be replaced when the other garments were sent out for dry-cleaning in 1939 while the auto-icon was undergoing restoration and restuffing in the Department of Egyptology. The garments were cleaned again in 1979. When asked, Sir James said he did not know in whose name the clothes went to the cleaners.

William Twining, the Professor of Jurisprudence at University College, said he customarily made points about the interpretation of evidence in his lectures by asking his students to consider a wide variety of possible interpretations of Bentham's wish to be preserved. One of these, he feels, was certainly vanity. ''But he was also making a serious materialistic point about the taboos we attach to death and burial,'' Professor Twining said. ''He was saying, 'This is just a thing.' ''

It was not until the year of Bentham's death that Parliament enacted a law he had advocated making dissection of cadavers for medical purposes lawful. Bentham asked that ''scientific and literary men'' be invited to attend lectures on ''the actions of animal economy'' when he himself was dissected as a demonstration against ''the primitive horror at dissection.'' Among those who came was James Mill, the father of John Stuart Mill and a philosopher in his own right.
 
Benthamist vs. Benthamite

Still, wasn't it strange and noteworthy, Professor Twining observed, that it was materialists like Lenin and Bentham who had their physical remains preserved.

The scholars sipped white wine and stood with their backs to the auto-icon as the president of the new society, Professor J. H. Burns, spoke about the significance of Bentham scholarship today. Those in the room were ''Benthamists'' rather than ''Benthamites,'' Professor Burns suggested, casting a theatrical glance at Bentham in his box to underscore the heretical point.

Benthamists, he was saying, honored the philosopher for his dedication to orderly social change and a rational legal system; that is, they were committed to a thorough and systematic discussion of public issues but not to such Benthamite notions as the calculation that human rights might be dispensed with when that served the happiness of the greatest number in society, or his contention that torture was easier to justify on the same utilitarian grounds than imprisonment.

Professor Burns, a historian who served for 18 years as the general editor of the Bentham Project, said that as a Scot he was bound to consider the philosopher ''a peculiarly English character.'' Later, in conversation, he acknowledged that he sometimes disliked Bentham as a man, even though he valued him as a thinker; that this was one of the reasons he gave up the editorship. ''I could live with Mill, but I couldn't live with Bentham,'' he said.

Bentham wrote that there could be a ''Temple of Fame'' and that eventually this ''could be filled with a population of illustrious Auto-Icons.'' But when the party at University College was over, he was left alone in his box.


February 5, 2009 2:19 am
BenthamJeremy
Feb. 15, 1748-June 6, 1832
Biography from British Authors of the 19th Century (1936)
Copyright (c) by The H. W. Wilson Company. All rights reserved. 

    BENTHAMJEREMY (February 15, 1748-June 6, 1832), philosopher and economist, was born in London. His great-grandfather was a pawnbroker, and his father, though an attorney by profession, gave more attention to what would now be called his real estate business; he was decidedly "on the make," and looked forward (vainly, as it happened) to profiting by the achievements of his brilliant son. For Jeremy was a child prodigy; he read Latin and Greek at three, like John Stuart Mill, and at five was known as "the philosopher." His parents tried to keep him from all sports or light reading--an ambition happily thwarted by summers spent with his grandmother near Reading. At seven, a sensitive, shy, undersized child, he was sent to Westminster School, and at twelve he entered Queen's College, Oxford. There his first religious doubts made him reluctant to sign the Thirty-nine Articles, as was required for enrollment.
    Bentham detested Oxford. Nevertheless he attained his B.A. in 1763, was entered at Lincoln's Inn, and succeeded to his M.A. in 1766, leaving Oxford finally the following year. As late as 1817 he was called to the bar, but he hardly made a pretence of practising law. Instead he experimented in chemistry, and began, with more fruitful results, to interest himself in politics and the theory of jurisprudence. His inimical commentary on Blackstone (the Fragment on Government) was almost the sole accomplishment of his professional legal career.
    For a time Bentham became depressed, and perhaps because of his extreme precocity, already felt himself to be a failure. An acquaintance, which speedily grew to intimacy, with Lord Shelburne (the first Lord Lansdowne) restored his self-esteem; as an habitue of Shelburne's house he met most of the men who were later to become his followers--not the least one Etienne Dumont, his disciple and translator. A less fortunate result was a meeting with a lady, whose name is unknown, but who inspired a lifelong unrequited passion in Bentham, and kept him a bachelor all his days.
    Before 1780 Bentham had already worked out the details of his utilitarian philosophy (afterwards to be known also as philosophic radicalism), and had written, though he had not published, his most famous book, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. In a sense all that he did afterward was in the nature of a commentary. Its main thesis, set forth by him with force and brilliance, is that men act only to attain pleasure or to avoid pain, and that this should be the objective of the moralist and the legislator. Punishment is evil, and should be resorted to only to avoid a greater evil. The seeds of this philosophy are in Hume and Helvetius, but the developed creed is Bentham's own. It made him the founder of a peculiarly English philosophical and ethical school.
    In 1785 Bentham went to visit a brother who was, strangely enough, an official of the Russian government. His observations in White Russia led him to an intense interest in penology, and particularly in a device--a sort of watch-tower and control-post in the midst of a factory or a prison--called the "Pantopticon."Bentham espoused the Pantopticon ardently for twenty-five years; he almost persuaded the British government to adopt it, and to dispense with deportation to Botany Bay; but in the end all he achieved was a refund of his expenses.
    In 1792 his father died and left him independently wealthy. In the same year the French revolutionary government made him an honorary citizen, in recognition of his friendship, for from his original Toryism he had gradually become a radical. His health failed and he thought of going to Mexico. Instead he settled at Ford Abbey, near Chard. There little by little he became a recluse, a sage whose disciples sat reverently, although infrequently, at his feet.
    His labor was indefatigable, and his production enormous, but his methods of work were most peculiar. As someone said, he was "always running from a good scheme to a better." He carried out several projects at once, wrote voluminously on scraps of paper, rewrote books before they were finished, and in fact for the most part simply turned out masses of notes which Dumont, James Mill, and others reduced to order. Most of his books were privately printed long before their general publication.
    Bentham's last public action was in helping to found the liberal Westminster Review in 1824. Even in his old age he worked with passion, as if to do all he could for humanity. When feebleness at last overcame him, he died as calmly as he had lived. He left his body to be dissected for the benefit of science, and his skeleton, dressed in his usual rather eccentric clothes, is still in the possession of University College.
    Bentham's interests extended to ethics, jurisprudence, logic and political economy. His style, once witty and powerful, became in the end dry and formal, with clarity its only virtue. He was fond of inventing new words; one which has survived is "international." Immense masses of his notes and manuscript are still unpublished. He influenced almost every thinker of his time. He himself remained entirely unspoiled, serene, even-tempered, and genuinely a lover of his kind.
    (M. A. deF.)

Suggested Reading: Bowring, J. Life (in Bentham's Collected Works); Everett, C. W. The Education of Jeremy Bentham; Ogden, C. K. Bentham's Theory of Fictions; Stephen, L. The English Utilitarians; Contemporary Review 142:213 August 1932; Queen's Quarterly 39:658 November 1832.

Selected Works: Fragment on Government (anonymous) 1776; View of the Hard Labor Bill, 1778; A Defence of Usury, 1787; Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1789; Pantopticon, 1791; A Protest Against Law Taxes, 1795; The Pantopticon versus New South Wales, 1802; A Plea for the Constitution, 1803; Scotch Reform, 1808; An Introductory View of the Rationale of Evidence, 1812; A Table of the Springs of Action, 1817; Papers Upon Condification and Public Institution, 1817; Swear Not at All, 1817; Church of Englandism and Its Catechism Examined, 1818; On the Liberty of the Press, 1821; The Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religon Upon the Temporal Happiness of Mankind (under name of Philip Beauchamp) 1822; Not Paul but Jesus (under name of Gamaliel Smith) 1823; Codification Proposals, 1823; A Book of Fallacies, 1824; Rationale of Reward, 1825; Rationale of Evidence, 1827; Rationale of Punishment, 1830; Constitutional Code, 1830; Deontology: or, The Science of Morality (posthumous) 1834; Collected Works (9 vols., posthumous) 1838-1843.

Citation:
Original source: British Authors of the 19th Century
Original publication date: 1936
Editor: Stanley Kunitz
Original publication type: Print
Publisher of original publication: The H. W. Wilson Company
Database publisher: The H.W. Wilson Company
Database: Biography Reference Bank

September 9, 2008 9:23 am I also recieved it two weeks ago.