BATMAN AND ROBIN #25

Review by: TheNextChampion

What did the
iFanboy
community think?

700
Pulls
Avg Rating: 3.3
 
Users who pulled this comic:
Users who reviewed this comic:
Written by JUDD WINICK; Art by GREG TOCCHINI; Cover by GUILLEM MARCH; Variant cover by J.G. JONES

Size: 32 pages
Price: 2.99

I gotta ask this straight up to all of the Judd Winick fans on this site:

What does he do for you as a writer? I’m asking this seriously because after yet another poor effort by Winick I fail to see what makes him a ‘good’ superhero writer. I’ve never judged his non-superhero work like ‘Pedro and Me’ because it was brilliant. But I’ve been on again, off again with this guy since he did his original ‘Green Arrow’ run and it’s just been mediocre at best. This issue, except for the hilarious cover by March, shows once again how uninteresting of a writer he really is.

This issue was just a bunch of quips and set pieces I would expect from a JCVD film but only better. The villains are just mindless drones and Winick’s sense of the dynamic duo is laughable at best. At least a writer like Paul Cornell tried to breath some life into this team. What has Winick done to make this group the fun team that has been around since Morrison started the book? Absolutely nothing. Then you have this business with Scarlett which doesn’t make any since because, as member @comicbookchris pointed out, her fate was practically sealed in issue #6 of this title. So why she has any involvement with this book, especially with her mask still on, makes no fucking sense.

Then you have the Tocchini art. While I appreciate it that this isn’t smeared with shit like last issue, it’s still a pretty poor effort on Tocchini, Smith, and everyone else involved. The anatomy and placement of characters in every panel of this book is ugly to look at and doesn’t mesh with an actual body. Tell me if this makes any sense: Todd is downright naked while doing a search in one panel, and immediately is back in his costume the next with no sense of transition. That’s the type of lazy composition Tocchini has to offer here. There are moments too where eyeballs are ‘kinda’ showing when they shouldn’t be (like on Damien) and it gives off this weird horror vibe to it. Basically this issue confirms that I should be very, VERY afraid for the future issues of ‘FF’ down the line.

So what did we ultimately learn in this issue and essentially this arc? That Jason Todd is a cold blooded killer and is one step ahead of everyone because Bruce taught him everything he knows. You know, exactly what Judd Winick has been teaching us for years now whenever he gets a hold of this fucking character! It’s a miracle that Winick doesn’t get a chance to finish this arc out and probably a miracle that Lobdell is writing the character in his future book. The fact that I prefer Scott Lobdell over anyone should tell you my thoughts on this issue as a whole. Shit story, shit art, and we have a very sad end coming with this once exciting series.

Story: 1 - Poor
Art: 2 - Average

Comments

  1. Heh. Amusing review.

    I don’t understand why you put an “@” before comicbookchris’s username, though. I’ve seen people do that here, but this isn’t Twitter. I can see writing an “@” when you want to address someone, but just placing it in front of someone’s name when used as a regular noun or direct object in a sentence is bizarre to me. Twitter doesn’t have to rewrite our brains to this extent, does it?

    Another pet peeve I have is this whole “day and date” catchphrase that seems to have sprung up amongst the people, because companies themselves aren’t using that terminology. “Day and date” means nothing. We may as well say “same-day”. Because if something digital is released on the same DAY, then of course it’s released on the same DATE as well. Imagine some company saying “Now, we’ll release this on the same DAY, but not on the same DATE, sorry.” It would make no sense.

    So, yeah, writing a @ in front of someone’s name for no reason and referring to “day and date”, these are some pet peeves that I have right now. Kind of off-topic, but I thought I’d write that here.

  2. @froggulper Well you can hit the ‘reply’ button on this site not and get an @ symbol with your name just like twitter. Plus in this day and age it’s a bit easier (and lazier I admit) to do that symbol then to write ‘At’.

    I guess my review was good……#walks away with piano playing

  3. @TheNextChampion  – you were generous on the art. I thought the issue was well written. Writin 3/5. art 1/5.

  4. Wow… couldn’t agree more on this. What a piece of shit this issue was! The art was mediocre at best, the writing was average; nothing great, nothing bad.

    After last issue I didn’t expect it to be anything more, but what can I do, I’m a completionist, so I still bought it. Hoping that the relaunch in September will fix things straight!

Leave a Comment