Review by: Nick Fovargue

What did the
community think?

Avg Rating: 3.8
Users who pulled this comic:
Users who reviewed this comic:
Story by Brian Michael Bendis, Jason Aaron, Ed Brubaker, Matt Fraction, & Jonathan Hickman
Art by Olivier Coipel & Mark Morales
Colors by Laura Martin
Letters by Chris Eliopoulos
Cover by Jim Cheung, Justin Ponsor, Sara Pichelli, & Adam Kubert

Size: 40 pages
Price: 3.99

****** SPOILERS ******

It has been said many times that these events are big summer blockbusters; popcorn movies that you can’t expect too much from. And I don’t expect much, believe me. These are the equivalent of a Michael Bay movie, conceived from an idea the equivalent of pabulum and so filled with spectacle that they don’t need to be good to be successful. And that is fine, not everything is for everyone and there is room in the world for big, dumb comics. But can we at least get big dumb comics about superheroes being superheroes?

Notice that “hero” is right there in the word, Superhero. Each generation of creators and editors is supposed to be the curators of these iconic heroes and villains and should not be discarding or undermining the resonance of these characters for the short term benefit of one story or for short-term financial returns. The trouble with these heroes fighting heroes events is that inevitably some of them end up cast as the villains. This is not what these characters are for. It is bad storytelling, in the long run, and bad brand management.

Have you ever noticed that in almost any story you have ever seen the possessed, brain-washed, mind controlled character always is stopped or breaks out of it at just the last minute? There is a reason for that. It is the same reason why most X-fans hate the third X-Men movie so vehemently. The hero can’t be made to do something so terrible as murder the innocent or a friend. That is what makes them a hero and not the same as the rest of us, they find a way to be better than that. It is true that there are other kinds of heroes out there, those more “grim and gritty” types where the rules perhaps are looser. It is also true that the X-Men and Cyclops have been on a grittier path for a long time but there are some moments that can permanently shift a character. Cyclops would seem to have been changed from the one kind of hero, with those certain rules, to another kind of character.

And Professor X …

We all know that death in comics doesn’t last and doesn’t have much lasting meaning in continuity or future stories. The result is that the importance, the drama or meaning has to come from the story of the death itself. The death of a character can be a powerful and worthwhile story, at Marvel you can look to the deaths of Jean Grey (the first time) and Captain Marvel (the first one) as examples of truly powerful stories that are worthy conclusions to the arc of a character. Unfortunately, in AvX we don’t get a worthy, iconic death of an iconic character, we get a plot point.

The real shame of it is that Brian Bendis is capable of doing this right, the death of Ultimate Peter Parker last year shows that. The difference is that when Peter died the story built to that point, earned that moment and the emotions that go with it. In AvX they take a character that has only been in the background of the story, and indeed of comics, and brings him into the center of this issue in order to kill him. In the very least they could have made it memorable or heroic, given us a stirring moment for the character to go out on. Instead there is a great deal of shouting and blasting and posturing, then we get a limp moment that does not service either character involved.

Now the story is not done and the fallout will take some time to be seen. After all, the greatest legacy of the deaths of Gwen Stacy and Bucky were their effects after the fact. So the jury should still be out, there may yet come strong stories from this death. With only one issue left, it is hard to see how AvX will end as a strong story, however.

Again, it is fine if you want to tell big dumb, summer blockbuster comics, just make them fun. The ideas of brother fighting brother or of a great man falling from grace are compelling and worthy stories, but they are also nuanced stories. They require stepping up to the plate to convey emotion and depth of character. No room is left in these events for that kind of sophistication, so why try to tell a story of which your efforts will not be worthy. Surely there is enough talent at these companies to tell fun stories of superheroes being superheroes, saving the world from villains, not from each other. Isn’t that the point of these characters? Don’t we all want some fun back in our comics?

Story: 1 - Poor
Art: 3 - Good


  1. I agree with the sentiment but what actually happened in the issue? Is it worth buying?

    • Cap is desperate. Hulk says, “Hulk will smash for you.” Cyclops is confronted by a last ditch stand of Avengers and X-Men, becomes the sole holder of the Phoenix, kills Xaiver and is finally the Dark Phoenix. Someone actually says, “It’s our worst nightmare.”

      It certainly wasn’t worth my $4. If you agree with my sentiments above, it probably isn’t going to be worth your $4 either.

      The art was often very pretty and many of the panel designs were interesting but I found the storytelling within the panels and from panel to panel to be a bit murky at times. A lot of sound and fury but often couldn’t tell just what I was looking at.

    • I love that iFanboy is a comic book discussion community where you can slyly quote Macbeth in a review of AvX 11.

    • I’m only reading the main series and I’m having a good time. I liked this issue. 4/5 for me

  2. Throughly depressing series.

  3. Completely true on every mark. I basically flipped through this in the store and just chuckled to myself on how inconsequential it would end up being. It made me think of how well Joss Whedon wrote Cyclops a few years ago, and how fans were finally willing to embrace the characters potential instead of thinking of him as just a bossy douchebag. And all that’s gone now. This is just so empty and shallow it really is laughable. Scott will be back in at least a year and everyone will forgive him because “The Phoenix made him do it.”

  4. Charles is dead again? What is it with X-men and death? Oh well, when he comes back I hope he’ll be rested after his vacation.

  5. Completely agree. Even with “the Phoenix made me do it” reasoning, Cyclops comes out looking like an asshole. Jean ate a planet, okay fine, but in the end she overcame her power lust and killed herself to keep from hurting those she loved. Cyclops? He blasts Emma, who he’s supposed to love, steals her power, then kills Professor X, the closest thing he has to a father. I dunno…You don’t really come back from that. To me, that’s Hank Pym-slaps-Janet level driving off a cliff.

    Still an issue left to see what comes out of all this…I’m hoping they can salvage Scott. I really liked that character.

Leave a Comment