Comments

1. wangman31888 says:

   July 2, 2012 at 5:42 pm

   Damn it. This robot-monster girl thing has been dragged out for long enough, just tell us what happened already, Kirkman!

   Log in to Reply
   • HarlemSkywalker says:

     July 2, 2012 at 11:20 pm

     I agree. I wish he would have just told us the entire story last issue.
   • Tuff_Ghost says:

     July 3, 2012 at 12:14 am

     In an interview he said it will be 5 issues to tell the story. Personally I”m really enjoying it and don’t mind that it’s taking a while.
2. zuper says:

   July 2, 2012 at 9:18 pm

   Anyone else remember when Invincible and Walking Dead were on the same #? Ahh the good old days. We could be having a double shot of #100 this month.

   Log in to Reply
3. jpriester73 says:

   July 3, 2012 at 1:18 am

   I’ve never read Invincible and was thinking I would give it a try as this is a light week for me. Is this at a point where I can jump right in or should I wait an issue or two for a new arc?

   Log in to Reply
   • Suicidalkangarooz says:

     July 3, 2012 at 1:39 pm

     It’s the second issue in the arc. I’d just recommend getting the first trade, or maybe just jump in anyway.
   • mathiasriffman says:

     July 3, 2012 at 2:38 pm

     I jumped in in the middle of a story arc (issue 69), and I haven’t looked back. Kirkman is a talented enough writer that you don’t need to “know” the whole story to enjoy the story. I say give it a shot.
   • jpriester73 says:

     July 6, 2012 at 1:42 am

     Thanks for the advise. I picked up 92 and 93; they were both great! I’ll probably pick up the trades to catch up on the story.
4. thewalrus1235 says:

   July 4, 2012 at 9:32 pm

   Holy Hell was that a return to form. Good ol’ Invincible, never really let’s you down.

   Log in to Reply