Comic Books

> > 707
BATMAN #707

Batman uncovers the secrets of Gotham City’s founding fathers and the secrets hidden within the city’s foundation. In a captivating turn of events, The Dark Knight finds that he alone holds the key to stopping the cataclysmic events that loom over Gotham. Don’t miss this stunning finale guest-starring I-Ching and Peacock, a spectacular new heroine from the Far East!

Written by TONY DANIEL
Art and Cover by TONY DANIEL

Price: $2.99
iFanboy Community Pick of the Week Percentage: 0.0%
423
Pulls
Avg Rating: 3.1
 
Users who pulled this comic:
 

Comments

  1. monkeypaw787 says:
    February 15, 2011 at 2:05 am

    I’m actually enjoying this book quite a lot. Tomasi, Snyder, and Daniel are really killing it on the Dick Grayson stories.

  2. Avatar photo NathanNicdao says:
    February 16, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    This actually a lot of fun.

  3. Avatar photo AquaPimp82 says:
    February 17, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    Whew, glad that’s over.

  4. Avatar photo mikeandzod21 says:
    February 17, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    This was AWFUL! this was so bad, I wish chuck Austen had written it. This was hackkneed, forced, ridiculously complex for complexity’s sake to the point where it was confusing, and down right rushed, from the writing to the art. I can’t beleive how bad this was, and that DC is actually publishing this rubbish while the rest of the Batman line, for the most part, is a pilar of excellence

  5. Avatar photo buck2889 says:
    February 17, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    While I liked the dialogue, I felt like the story as a whole was stretched too thin.  The whole story of Peacock and the beholder was a bit boring for a four issue arc.  This could have been a one shot really. And I like Daniel’s art, but how old does he think riddler is?  Also, I’m really not drawn in to where I think this is headed.  Can’t we leave Gilda alone?  But he does seem to have found Dick’s voice which is nice.

  6. Avatar photo WadeWilson says:
    February 19, 2011 at 7:52 am

    The story was deritative, dull, confusing, boring & it failed to make me care about what happened to any of the characters.

    The dialogue was wooden, stilted & clunky.

    The art was inconsistent; some panels were good, some were poor. The stoey-telling aspect of the art was terrible. It was hard to tell what the artist was trying to communicate was happening on a lot of pages.

    2/5 offensive Asian stereotypes, from me.

    But, on the bright side — only one more issue of Daniel writing, then Batman gets a WRITER writing the book. Whodathunkit?

  7. Avatar photo Slockhart says:
    February 19, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    Batfans (myself included) will generally buy Batman and Detective, regardless of quality. Tony Daniel isn’t a big name, so he probably works cheap, and paying one person to do story and art is probably cheaper than hiring two people.

    Tony Daniel is merely a money saving strategy by DC. 

  8. Avatar photo kennyg says:
    February 23, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    Not good. Tony Daniel should stick to art. Glad Scott Snyder is on Detective, I am dropping this if Daniel continues to write.

Leave a Comment