Comments

1. wangman31888 says:

   January 9, 2012 at 4:40 pm

   I’m getting that deja vu feeling, and not in a good way

   Log in to Reply
   • davidtobin100 says:

     January 10, 2012 at 5:01 am

     Agreed. I’m gonna stick with it until Bendis wraps up his run but I don’t see myself staying with issues after that.
   • wangman31888 says:

     January 11, 2012 at 4:27 pm

     I picked it up, looked through it, then put it back down…

     has New Avengers had less “juice” then right now??
2. sitara119 says:

   January 13, 2012 at 10:49 am

   aside from the cheezy “go” splash page, i had a good time while ready this.
   if norman osborn ever made another film appearance, i wonder who would play the role? would it be willem dafoe? might they actually get tommy lee jones to do it? or is he too old?
   just a thought

   Log in to Reply
   • RoiVampire says:

     January 13, 2012 at 1:16 pm

     Jones is too old now but damn i don’t know of anyone off hand that could pull off Norman if he was written the way Bendis and Ellis write him. Maybe Christoph Waltz
   • sitara119 says:

     January 14, 2012 at 12:02 am

     he was great in inglourious bastards.
3. doomwad says:

   January 15, 2012 at 11:21 pm

   I feel as if I already read this issue several times already. I think I feel the same way about the Dark Avengers as I do the Karsashians.

   Log in to Reply
4. BionicDave says:

   January 16, 2012 at 4:58 am

   I totally agree with the opinion that this issue was re-tread. As much as I like Osborn and the concept of “dark Avengers” – Bendis has already done this before, in pretty much exactly this same way. New Avengers and Avengers stories all seem blurry to me lately; like an unfocused mishmash of character beats, with no feeling of set-up / exposition / denouement.

   Log in to Reply
5. mgriffith says:

   January 16, 2012 at 9:00 am

   Big battle issue in the mighty Marvel style with a slightly stale feeling to it.

   Glad I got this issue at a healthy discount.

   Log in to Reply