Avatar photo

AlanMac

Name: Alan Mac

Bio:


Reviews
AlanMac's Recent Comments
October 19, 2011 2:03 pm As I understand it, it's not a 6 week shipping cycle. Jim Lee has stated quite a few times that JL is a third week book that they shipped early in the first month to make it the first book out. Lee's been working on this for months in secret and I'd be surprised if there weren't already 5 or 6 issues in the can.
July 8, 2011 2:39 pm Just as an FYI, the guy in Project Superman is getting his powers from Doomsday, aka Project 6.  You need to have read the Booster issues to understand that, though.  It should have been made clearer in this issue on it's own.  Once you see that the story clicks a bit better.
April 20, 2011 12:54 am I believe Chandler Bing put it best

BIGHEADBIGHEADBIGHEAD!
April 11, 2011 7:27 pm Is Marvel being purposefully vague about everything it puts out from now on?

I'm still not sure what Fear Itself is about even after the first issue has been released.  Their pitches now just sound like "There'll be a thing and it'll be really important.  Now give us money"
February 17, 2011 3:38 am My only exposure to her is from Robot Chicken and the Robot Chicken commentaries.  She seems like a fun, nice person.  Good luck to her.
January 25, 2011 4:00 am 587+13=600.

I give it 13 months.
January 14, 2011 4:30 am I loved the first 12 issues of Planetary.  I think they're about as perfect as comics can get.

Unfortunately, when Ellis started phoning it in the writing went downhill fast.  I got a real air of resentment from him in the last few issues as he sped through plot points with none of the interesting pacing and examination of the first run in an effort to get the monkey off his back.

Mind you, I was there from the beginning and had a healthy dose of resentment built in for the disrespect shown to the readers as we waited to see what happened and had promises continually broken.

I'd still recommend it to readers, though.  The standalone stories are wonderful, beautiful things even if I feel the arc falls kind of flat.
November 17, 2010 6:30 am

Looks like fun.  My only quibbles are Blake Lively's delivery on that piece of exposition was extraordinarily wooden.  I've not seen her in anything else, but I've never heard anything bad about her acting skills.  Surely there was another take?  And they seem to be following the Transformers movies by overly complicating CG effects while quick cutting around them.  Which makes it difficult (for me at least) to get a read on what I'm supposed to have just seen.   It's a trailer though, and I'm not going to take that as a guide for the look/pace of the film. 

The space/alien stuff looked very nice.  And while Reynolds isn't going to win any awards, I find him really enjoyable in everything he's in.  He must be holding a record for the number of comic characters played now, surely?

November 3, 2010 2:22 pm

Another point to make is that Dan Didio's Sunday afternoon panels always mention how much he enjoys/enjoyed Marvel Comics and have Marvel creators on them to talk about how they all love comics and their stories about growing up with them.

I find them pretty heartwarming I have to say.  

November 3, 2010 5:28 am

Why not just put a flash on the title saying "The start of a brand new exciting story!"  Or give them a banner, since Marvel seems to like banners.  Or even a specific logo/title branding.

I just don't see the benefit to this system.  Why hide away the fact that it's a jumping on point in the numbering box?  Which is generally so small as to be unreadable.  Are new readers going to scan shelves to see ".1" after a number on a cover, provided they enter a store that shelves their comics in such a way as you can see the numbering?  After the proprietor has identified them as a new reader (by some form of telepathy or by knowing all of his customers by sight) and then explained to them that ".1" after a comic means that they should read that comic so they won't get scared away by ongoing stories.

Marketing-wise it's a mess.  As a campaign it doesn't know what it's audience is, doesn't convey a clear message and it hides it's own identity.

The only thing this reminds me of is the bizarre 0.5 issue craze of the mid-90s, which goes along with the revival of everything else from that decade.