wiski

May 18, 2012 11:26 am I approve of your thoughts.

May 17, 2012 10:00 am Most artists can barely handle one comic a month and you want Shalvey on more than the two he's already going to be switching back and forth on? (Thunderbolts/Dark Avengers and Venom) In any case, it's too bad you're jumping off. I am gonna believe Parker until he proves otherwise that the comic is going to be what it has been, and that the name change is only that, a name change. The characters being brought in might not be who Parker may have wanted, but I don't have any trouble believing he would have had replacements come in to take over for the missing Thunderbolts at some point, since it makes sense in the story, and I'd bet would have happened if the name of the comic was getting changed or not. Hey, it absolutely could not be worse than the Warren Ellis/Mike Deodato Thunderbolts.

May 17, 2012 5:52 am Or maybe he's telling the truth?

May 16, 2012 12:20 pm Parker has said it's not a reboot, just a continuation of what he would have done anyway with a different title.

May 15, 2012 11:24 am Here's to hoping there aren't any talking birds in this issue...

May 10, 2012 6:38 pm First I lose Moore and now I lose Remender, when they were the only reasons I gave Venom a chance in the first place... I guess I'll give Bunn a shot, but it would be easier if they actually got a steady artist on the book.

May 10, 2012 10:08 am If Bradshaw drew like he drew Danger Girl, he would be better, but since he is not, Bachalo is better.

May 10, 2012 5:43 am That depends on if this solicit was implying that they would tell you or just asking you if you knew what happened.

May 9, 2012 5:12 pm DITTO in all caps.

May 8, 2012 1:09 pm Agreed, I own it and enjoyed it more than either of the remakes.