WonderManFan

February 24, 2012 9:58 am Hm... it's been over six months since the new website launched, and you guys still haven't re-launched a mobile version. Now it's been a few months since you guys went on "hiatus", and still no new video shows. I'm just glad I never spent any money on a membership. I appreciate the free content, when you guys get around to it. If I have to root for one option over the other, could you please try to get a mobile version of the site back sometime in the next, I don't know, year or so? Thanks P.S. Sorry to be so negative, but I used to think very highly of the quality of your mobile website and the quality of your timely content, so much so that I would recommend your site to my friends all of the time. Now, I'm not sure that I'd recommend you guys any longer, and that makes me sad. I just miss the days when ifanboy seemed to care more about putting out quality in a timely manner and trying to reach more readers and fans in a variety of ways. I'm not sure if the cuts are about financial problems or about burn-out, but I hope you guys get back to your old ways soon.

February 21, 2012 5:02 pm I think a Mr. Fixit vs. the 90's West Coast Avengers would be great to read, but Wonder Man better mop the floor with the Hulk. Given their power levels at the time, Wonder Man alone should be able to get the job done.

February 21, 2012 4:59 pm Pretty sure George Clooney is going to be in this...

August 9, 2011 5:18 pm Wonder Man & the Beast should have been #1, but otherwise a good list.

August 7, 2011 11:20 pm Love the Wonder Man reference. Keep up the great work, guys.

August 5, 2011 12:00 pm Catwoman, huh? Wake me up when they make the Wonder Man movie...

June 27, 2011 1:23 pm I miss the days of having a "house style" of the artwork at Marvel, where you could open any book and know it was a Marvel book. For me, it was cleaner and made it much easier to focus on the story. Maybe it was the stronger executive control, but it seemed like most books came out on time and the cross overs, timelines, and continuity was smoother overall. I prefer that system over a "I'm a writer/artist and I created this character so I'm important and I should get paid into eternity" kind of mentality.

May 28, 2011 1:51 pm Good article, though it would have been good to hear more of the law of diminishing returns. @ Quinn: I think scaling the prices of low selling titles (so an underperforming title would sell for $1.99) is a great idea. It would encourage more readers to take a chance on it, which should grow the readership. I don't like scaling the best selling prices up, because readers tend to get drawn to the comic book stores to buy the Avengers, and while they are there, they may take a chance on a few other titles. If you raise the price on the Avengers, you make it less likely they will come to the store for it, and therefore less likely they will buy the other titles they would otherwise have been taking a chance on. Good point though. I think it all comes down to growing the base, by getting more people to try comics, and therefore buy comics. However, the price point is too high for most people to enter the buyers market, so the companies are just stretching a shrinking base. Both companies are engaging in a temporarily successful, but long -term doomed sales plan.

May 28, 2011 1:13 pm @ericmci: great point. It would be pretty pointless to donate downloads to people who don't even have homes. Long live the power of real comic books.

May 25, 2011 9:10 pm $4.99 for the first issue? I think I'd rather have an entire hot and fresh pizza from Little Caesars, for the same price. $3.99 for every issue after that? Good grief, I'm so tired of the ridiculous price points. Guess this is one more series I won't be buying. I'll say this about the 90's: people like to make fun of that era, but at least comics didn't cost an arm and a leg per issue, and sales were much higher than the are now. Coincidence?