NawfalQ

February 12, 2012 1:05 pm agreed

February 11, 2012 8:34 pm Okay, read *most* of the comments. I guess whenever people start ranking and comparing and making these sorts of assessments (be it in comics, sports, or music), I kinda want to understand the criteria first. How can someone be "overrated" without anyone mentioning which criterion is being rated? Is it comic sales qua actual sales numbers? Is it some subjective aesthetic ideal? Is it value of salary? Is it who has more followers? It seems many would suggest that the fact that the person in question was a catalyst for change makes them great. However, how is change measured - and is all change good? If we're going to use the term pariah, it should be understood that these examples are outcasts... and, clearly, Moore is "outcast." (Self-inflicted outcast, maybe.) By the same token, I am not sure Loeb qualifies.

February 4, 2012 6:53 pm Yes! Also: "Impudent dog! . . . . swallow your own tongue at once!"

February 2, 2012 11:18 pm The Jae Lee "Ozy" cover.... I feel like Lee draws that similar cover a lot. (Cp. Namor (2010) #1 and Wolverine (2010) #1)

February 1, 2012 11:48 am *snort* annnnddd soda in the snout.....

January 30, 2012 11:36 pm Thanks Ken. I agree "ongoing" is poor word in general, but contextually I see we all knew what I meant. I hope this is good, but I don't wanna raise my hopes only for disappointment. I'd comment more, but got distracted by the mention of coffee.......

January 30, 2012 4:30 pm Yes. Agreed.

January 30, 2012 4:29 pm Is this a miniseries/limited or an ongoing? (And, yes, I know "ongoing" lately means - "Hey, it made 10 issues!")

January 30, 2012 4:27 pm Stop stealing my thoughts!

January 30, 2012 4:27 pm lol, too