GhostGrifter

GhostGrifter

Name: Chris Galbraith

Bio:

Twitter:


Reviews

The reason why I liked the story in this issue (and the past couple of issues) is the same reason…

Read full review and comments
GhostGrifter's Recent Comments
April 2, 2012 6:27 pm Cool! Clicked on the cover image above and loaded the Marvel AR app on my iPhone. Not bad.
September 13, 2011 4:46 pm The question of a DC / Marvel crossover came up several times at the Marvel panels during FanExpo. Marvel said that DC has certain conditions (editorial / financial?) for a crossover to happen that Marvel cannot / will not comply with. They do not see a crossover happening anything in the near future.
August 4, 2011 9:23 am Just like Ultimate Spider-Man 160, this book rated another "Meh" from me. I'm sorry, but the over-hyped reveal did nothing for me. We don't know this person, we don't know their story, etc. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. We will find out more in (another) Ultimate Spider-Man #1.

Seriously though, if the issue is polly-bagged and Marvel announces all the new details to the press the day before, I will not buy any more Ultimate titles (and I have purchased every Ultimate title post-Ultimatum relaunch).
April 18, 2011 1:26 pm

I like the costume design. As soon as I saw this pic, I set it as my iPhone lockscreen wallpaper.

January 26, 2011 10:09 am @D  Yup. same thing happened to me on Facebook... My local radio station posted the spoiler right in the title of their post. There was no avoiding it!
October 25, 2010 7:08 pm No!! Keep Portacio for as long as possible!!
February 5, 2010 4:56 pm Can I watch this even though I've only watched up to the end of Season 2?
November 9, 2009 6:09 pm This series is now on the fence for me. If the stories stay strange and weird... I'm jumping ship.
November 9, 2009 5:37 pm And I thought Wolverine made too many appearances in Marvel Comics in a month! I knew this issue was going to be a filler... but Deadpool. This issue is going to the bottom of my stack.
November 1, 2009 1:34 pm

Nice review. Saves me from writing something about this crap-tacular issue. I rated the issue a 1: Bad plot hole, bad drawing (See me earlier comment about Paul Smith, back in issue "I don't care 'cause he was drawing"), "meh" story....

 I thought this series was supposed to be a reboot of the series I loved from the 90's.... 10 issues in, and I barely recognize anything from the original series: too many changes in characters and plots. If the next story line doesn't pick up.... I will be dropping this title.